<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] DRAFT2: registrars constituency statement on approval process for changes in gtld services (Registry Services)
- To: "'Bruce Tonkin'" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] DRAFT2: registrars constituency statement on approval process for changes in gtld services (Registry Services)
- From: "tbarrett" <tbarrett@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 18:25:39 -0500
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <AFEF39657AEEC34193C494DBD717922202FC7B4B@phoenix.mit>
- Reply-to: <tbarrett@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I would endorse this draft.
Tom
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bruce Tonkin
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 3:32 AM
To: registrars@xxxxxxxx
Subject: [registrars] DRAFT2: registrars constituency statement on approval
process for changes in gtld services (Registry Services)
Hello All,
I have updated the DRAFT statement following input received since Friday 9
Jan 2004.
This is the second draft.
I have added some text about unsponsored tlds as requested by Werner.
I have added some additional text relating to competition issues.
I require 5 endorsements to be able to put this statement to a vote. If you
support the paper please respond to the list. If you don't support it,
please let me know and I will attempt to accommodate.
Regards,
Bruce Tonkin
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|