<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] [Fwd: [dow3tf] Envoi d'un message : TMP1071162345.htm]
- To: <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>, <michael@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] [Fwd: [dow3tf] Envoi d'un message : TMP1071162345.htm]
- From: "Elana Broitman" <ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 13:56:07 -0500
- Cc: <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcPA4MZSI+zHqhY+REeWH+ED8Qa9uwAALrPQ
- Thread-topic: [registrars] [Fwd: [dow3tf] Envoi d'un message : TMP1071162345.htm]
So, to Tim's,Rob's and Brian's point, why not also appoint outside advisors from our constituency. Again, we can simply ask the runners up from the elections for these TFs
Elana Broitman
Register.com
575 Eighth Avenue
New York, NY 10018
Phone (212) 798-9215
Fax (212) 629-9309
ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: ross@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:49 PM
To: michael@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: registrars@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [registrars] [Fwd: [dow3tf] Envoi d'un message :
TMP1071162345.htm]
On 12/12/2003 1:24 PM Michael D. Palage noted that:
> ...the need for ALL constituencies to be
> properly represented and have their voice heard.
I believe that this is the case already. The confusion stems not from a
lack of representation or bad rules and processes, but instead, from my
failure to read all of my email. A quick glance at the whois-TF mailing
list archives will show that the rules governing TF membership,
participation rights and representativity are all very clearly defined.
I will summarize them here to everyone the trouble of finding it for
themselves (and as penance for causing the confusion in the first
place.) Please disregard everything else I have said on the subject, I
was wrong.
I am not sure what capacity Marilyn is acting in, this needs to be
clarified. I have assumed that she was acting as a liaison from another
Whois TF, but she may also be acting as an outside advisor as the chair
of the former Whois TF. It is also possible, but not likely, that she is
indeed an observer for the BCUC and should therefore yield the floor to
Sarah. Again, I don't believe that this final possibility is the case.
Again, I apologize to everyone for having caused this confusion and hope
that we can move on to more substantive matters.
Excerpted from various Whois-TF posts by the Secretariat...
--
Participants:
- 1 representative from each constituency
- ALAC liaison
- GAC liaison
- ccNSO liaison
- SECSAC liaison
- liaisons from other GNSO WHOIS task forces
- up to three outside advisors
The ICANN bylaws
http://www.icann.org/general/archive-bylaws/bylaws-15dec02.htm#AnnexA
5. Composition and Selection of Task Forces
a. Upon voting to appoint a task force, the Council shall invite each of
the constituencies of the GNSO to appoint one individual to participate
in the task force. Additionally, the Council may appoint up to three
outside advisors to sit on the task force. (Each task force member is
referred to in this Annex as a "Representative" and collectively, the
"Representatives"). The Council may increase the number of
Representatives per constituency that may sit on a task force in its
discretion in circumstances that it deems necessary or appropriate.
--
-rwr
"Don't be too timid and squeamish about your actions.
All life is an experiment.
The more experiments you make the better."
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Got Blog? http://www.blogware.com
My Blogware: http://www.byte.org
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|