<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] [Fwd: [dow3tf] Envoi d'un message : TMP1071162345.htm]
- To: Rob Hall <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [registrars] [Fwd: [dow3tf] Envoi d'un message : TMP1071162345.htm]
- From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 13:30:42 -0500
- Cc: registrars@xxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <COEELGHKNGFGPAPMBEELIEDPDBAA.rob@momentous.com>
- Organization: Tucows Inc.
- References: <COEELGHKNGFGPAPMBEELIEDPDBAA.rob@momentous.com>
- Reply-to: ross@xxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4
On 12/11/2003 1:24 PM Rob Hall noted that:
I find at these things that anyone on the call typically gets an opinion and
it can have weight/sway.
In practice, I've found exactly the opposite actually. Constituencies
speaking with one voice have, historically speaking anyways, been
treated better by the consensus policy development process. I made a
recommendation along those lines to the ExComm last week but haven't
heard anything back yet regarding a final decision.
The many voices/more leverage dynamic usually comes into play outside
the formal work of the TF (ie - lobbying staff, working with other
constituencies in the hallways, et al).
At the end of the day, its not my call to make.
--
-rwr
"Don't be too timid and squeamish about your actions.
All life is an experiment.
The more experiments you make the better."
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Got Blog? http://www.blogware.com
My Blogware: http://www.byte.org
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|