ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] Deletes task force

  • To: "'Registrars Constituency'" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [registrars] Deletes task force
  • From: "Bhavin Turakhia" <bhavin.t@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 20:59:22 +0530
  • Importance: Normal
  • In-reply-to: <3FCC0E4D.10102@tucows.com>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

All for one and one for all .... Count me in ....

- bhavin



> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ross Wm. Rader
> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 9:30 AM
> To: Tim Ruiz
> Cc: 'Registrars Constituency'
> Subject: Re: [registrars] Deletes task force
> 
> 
> On 12/1/2003 10:36 PM Tim Ruiz noted that:
> 
> > if the registries would just agree
> > to charge at the end of the grace period, keeping 
> auto-renew in place, 
> > wouldn't we still have the best of both worlds?
> 
> I think we would. At this point I propose the following;
> 
> This doesn't strike me as being an ICANN or constituency 
> issue. As such, 
> we should probably move the discussion elsewhere. I am in the 
> process of 
> drafting a letter to the registries that outlines our 
> concerns and will 
> solicit additional registrar signatories throughout this week. This 
> letter will include an invitation to the registry operators 
> that engage 
> in this practice to participate in a teleconference at a to 
> be announced 
> time.
> 
> I think it is in our best interests to look at this as a 
> customer/supplier issue and also be keenly cautious of the 
> legal issues 
> that may surround an action of this nature. I am specifically not 
> suggesting that we form any sort of collective bargaining group or 
> attempt to coerce the registries through some sort of 
> organized boycott 
> into adopting our viewpoint. I am simply proposing that we 
> gather in the 
>   same room, allow them to hear our mutual concerns and specifically 
> request that they return to us with a proposal that will provide my 
> company, and presumably others, with more comfortable operating 
> arrangements.
> 
> This is just off the top of my head and I'd be happy to modify the 
> concept with input from others. I will forward a draft later tomorrow 
> for review.
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> 
> 
> 	-rwr
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> "In the modern world the intelligence of public opinion is the one 
> indispensable condition for social progress."
> 	- Charles W. Eliot (1834 - 1926)
> 




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>