<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Deletes task force
- To: <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] Deletes task force
- From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 17:04:50 +1100
- Cc: "Registrars Constituency" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcO4ikyZCsbJAZP9QWOkLhT63ANCvwAD9xRw
- Thread-topic: [registrars] Deletes task force
I support this colloborative approach.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ross Wm. Rader [mailto:ross@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, 2 December 2003 3:00 PM
> To: Tim Ruiz
> Cc: 'Registrars Constituency'
> Subject: Re: [registrars] Deletes task force
>
>
> On 12/1/2003 10:36 PM Tim Ruiz noted that:
>
> > if the registries would just agree
> > to charge at the end of the grace period, keeping
> auto-renew in place,
> > wouldn't we still have the best of both worlds?
>
> I think we would. At this point I propose the following;
>
> This doesn't strike me as being an ICANN or constituency
> issue. As such,
> we should probably move the discussion elsewhere. I am in the
> process of
> drafting a letter to the registries that outlines our
> concerns and will
> solicit additional registrar signatories throughout this week. This
> letter will include an invitation to the registry operators
> that engage
> in this practice to participate in a teleconference at a to
> be announced
> time.
>
> I think it is in our best interests to look at this as a
> customer/supplier issue and also be keenly cautious of the
> legal issues
> that may surround an action of this nature. I am specifically not
> suggesting that we form any sort of collective bargaining group or
> attempt to coerce the registries through some sort of
> organized boycott
> into adopting our viewpoint. I am simply proposing that we
> gather in the
> same room, allow them to hear our mutual concerns and specifically
> request that they return to us with a proposal that will provide my
> company, and presumably others, with more comfortable operating
> arrangements.
>
> This is just off the top of my head and I'd be happy to modify the
> concept with input from others. I will forward a draft later tomorrow
> for review.
>
> --
> Regards,
>
>
> -rwr
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "In the modern world the intelligence of public opinion is the one
> indispensable condition for social progress."
> - Charles W. Eliot (1834 - 1926)
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|