<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[registrars] Regarding participation on multiple task forces
- To: "Registrars Constituency" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [registrars] Regarding participation on multiple task forces
- From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2003 04:16:31 +1100
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcOlJt9g6E+pWdCyRUmDZht4iaiatwAKDZlg
- Thread-topic: Regarding participation on multiple task forces
Hello Tim,
What I recommend is that if one person is elected to more than one task
force, that person makes a choice as to their preferred task force, and
resigns from the other task force/s. The registrars constituency could
then appoint the person with the next highest number of votes to the
task force/s.
ie if a person truely believes they have the time to spend on multiple
task forces then that should be their choice, but I such a person
consider this very carefully.
Regards,
Bruce
member of registrars constituency representing Melbourne IT
_____
From: Tim Ruiz [mailto:tim@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, 7 November 2003 4:01 AM
To: Bruce Tonkin; 'Registrars Constituency'
Bruce,
Agreed. I do not want to be on multiple task forces. But I would
like to be on at least one of them. I think that may be why some of us
have accepted multiple nominations. Any resultant policy from any of
these three task forces will impact registrars/registries (implementers)
and registrants (registrars' customers) more than any other stake
holders.
Perhaps the Executive Committee could suggest a way to resolve
the issue if one person should get elected to multiple task forces. I
don't think there is enough time to hold them sequentially.
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bruce Tonkin
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 1:03 AM
To: Registrars Constituency
Subject: RE: [registrars] Recaputulation of nominations.
Hello All,
Just a general comment.
It is preferable that we have a separate person for each task
force, rather than end up with a person serving on multiple task forces
due to the work load involved.
Regards,
Bruce Tonkin
member of registrars constituency representing Melbourne IT
_____
From: Elana Broitman [mailto:ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, 5 November 2003 6:50 AM
To: Robert F. Connelly; Registrars Constituency
Thanks Bob.
I would also like to nominate Tim Ruiz for Accuracy and
Data Collection and Display. I would also like to nominate Brian Cute
for the Accuracy and Data Collection task forces. Either of them would
do a great job.
I believe that we have a very good set of candidates
here, and although the Council has asked for only 1 rep to each, would
hope that the eventual choice of the constituency to any of these task
forces would work very closely with the other nominees on this list.
Thanks
Elana Broitman
Register.com
575 Eighth Avenue
New York, NY 10018
Phone (212) 798-9215
Fax (212) 629-9309
ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert F. Connelly
[mailto:rconnell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 9:13 AM
To: Registrars Constituency
Subject: RE: [registrars] Recaputulation of
nominations.
Importance: High
Dear Registrars: Here is a recapitulation of
the nominations to date. It is like trying to describe a moving
train;-} I just posted what was then complete about five minutes ago.
Accuracy:
Elana Broitman
Nominated and endorsed by Paul Stahura
Endorsed by Tim Ruiz
Elana has now accepted
Elana has made a position statement
Elana has made a conflict of interest statement.
Data Mining
Paul Stahura Nominated and endorsed by BobC
Endorsed and Seconded by Joyce Lin and Bruce
Tonkin
I take Paul's self nomination as an acceptance
This nomination is now complete.
No statement or conflict of interest statement
received to date
Elana Broitman nominated and endorsed by Tim
Ruiz
Additional endorsement needed
Elana has now accepted
Elana has made a position statement
Elana has made a conflict of interest statement.
Data Collection and Display
Tom Keller Nominated by Bruce Tonkin. This
nomination did not included an endorsement
Endorsed and Seconded by Nikojaj Nyholm
Accepted by Bruce
Still requires one endorsement.
Respectfully submitted,
by Bob Connelly
Secretary of RC
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|