Re: [registrars] Recaputulation of nominations.

["Joyce Lin" <joyce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Then we would need more nominees in every opening in case of the moving
around and leaving a position without being filled. Possible??

Joyce Lin
007names.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Elana Broitman" <ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>; <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Registrars
Constituency" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 10:19 AM
Subject: RE: [registrars] Recaputulation of nominations.


> I think that we would all agree with this sentiment.  I would further
propose the following process:
>
> Each candidate should state their order of preference for the task forces.
Anyone winning multiple seats, would automatically get their top choice and
be removed as the winner of the next choices.  The winning slot for the
second or third choice task force would be filled with the runner up in that
task force.  If the runner up was also a designee for another task force
through this ballot, that person would also be designated their top choice.
>
> The benefits would be a) to automatically designate winners and b) help
direct appropriate voting by registrars.
>
> Best,
>
> Elana Broitman
> Register.com
> 575 Eighth Avenue
> New York, NY 10018
> Phone (212) 798-9215
> Fax   (212) 629-9309
> ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Ruiz [mailto:tim@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 8:48 AM
> To: ross@xxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: 'Bruce Tonkin'; 'Registrars Constituency'
> Subject: RE: [registrars] Recaputulation of nominations.
>
>
> I agree Ross, and would do the same.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ross Wm. Rader [mailto:ross@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 7:12 AM
> To: Tim Ruiz
> Cc: 'Bruce Tonkin'; 'Registrars Constituency'
> Subject: Re: [registrars] Recaputulation of nominations.
>
> On 11/7/2003 7:01 AM Tim Ruiz noted that:
>
> > Agreed. I do not want to be on multiple task forces.
>
> I don't think that its physically possible ;) Personally speaking, if by
> some fluke of the voting process one us were to be elected to more than
> one spot, it would seem to make sense for the candidate to stand aside
> on the additional spots in favor of the next most popular candidate - I
> certainly will be if I end up in the position Bruce describes.
>
>
> --
>
>                         -rwr
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>                  "Don't be too timid and squeamish about your actions.
>                                             All life is an experiment.
>                              The more experiments you make the better."
>                          - Ralph Waldo Emerson
>
> Got Blog? http://www.blogware.com
> My Blogware: http://www.byte.org
>
>
>