ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] Task Force Nomination

  • To: "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Registrars Constituency" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [registrars] Task Force Nomination
  • From: "Elana Broitman" <ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 13:23:49 -0500
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcOkj2r358q01ajLTeKefN0ZCuhnVAAA6ZSQ
  • Thread-topic: [registrars] Task Force Nomination

He is right - there is no requirement of a specific statement, but it is "politic" as you point out.

Elana Broitman
Register.com
575 Eighth Avenue
New York, NY 10018
Phone (212) 798-9215
Fax   (212) 629-9309
ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx 


-----Original Message-----
From: Robert F. Connelly [mailto:rconnell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 12:44 PM
To: Registrars Constituency
Subject: RE: [registrars] Task Force Nomination 


At 12:04 PM 11/6/03 -0500, Elana Broitman wrote:
>Precedence: bulk
>
>Bob - I also saw an acception and conflict of interest statement from Tom K.

Dear Elana:  Thank you, it's been like trying to describe a moving train -- 
that's leaking fuel;-}  And taking on new passengers.

I've updated the Excel sheet accordingly.

Tim Ruiz has raised an interesting point, that there does not appear to be 
a requirement for a candidate's statement.  I guess it is just our 
practice.  I wonder whether our members would be impressed by a candidate 
who did not say more than "I accept"?  Perhaps we would if he or she had 
Amadeu's history.

Regards, BobC







<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>