<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Task Force Nomination
- To: Registrars Constituency <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] Task Force Nomination
- From: "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 09:43:31 -0800
- In-reply-to: <BCAAA5D64C837641A9EBB93E2A50894807731B70@ex2k01.corp.regis ter.com>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
At 12:04 PM 11/6/03 -0500, Elana Broitman wrote:
Precedence: bulk
Bob - I also saw an acception and conflict of interest statement from Tom K.
Dear Elana: Thank you, it's been like trying to describe a moving train --
that's leaking fuel;-} And taking on new passengers.
I've updated the Excel sheet accordingly.
Tim Ruiz has raised an interesting point, that there does not appear to be
a requirement for a candidate's statement. I guess it is just our
practice. I wonder whether our members would be impressed by a candidate
who did not say more than "I accept"? Perhaps we would if he or she had
Amadeu's history.
Regards, BobC
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|