<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] unsanctioned whois concepts (long)
- To: <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] unsanctioned whois concepts (long)
- From: "Christopher Ambler" <chris@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 18:41:00 -0800
- Cc: "'Rick Wesson'" <wessorh@xxxxxx>, "'Tim Ruiz'" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <markjr@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <3FA1CB25.1010507@tucows.com>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcOfWCJsB6ffTcNRQvKh22w47Tm44QAACXpg
>Much clearer - thanks. I'm still short on understanding wrt the
>specifics of the delta between present and desired state, but I guess it
>can wait until you actually make a proposal ;)
I'm writing it up over the weekend. And, to be clear, Tim's comments on
using a key for transfers is a separate issue, though I've noted that what
I'll be proposing would dovetail with it nicely, and I'll be noting that in
my writeup.
Christopher
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|