ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] unsanctioned whois concepts (long)

  • To: <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [registrars] unsanctioned whois concepts (long)
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <chris@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 18:41:00 -0800
  • Cc: "'Rick Wesson'" <wessorh@xxxxxx>, "'Tim Ruiz'" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <markjr@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <3FA1CB25.1010507@tucows.com>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcOfWCJsB6ffTcNRQvKh22w47Tm44QAACXpg

>Much clearer - thanks. I'm still short on understanding wrt the 
>specifics of the delta between present and desired state, but I guess it 
>can wait until you actually make a proposal ;)

I'm writing it up over the weekend. And, to be clear, Tim's comments on
using a key for transfers is a separate issue, though I've noted that what
I'll be proposing would dovetail with it nicely, and I'll be noting that in
my writeup.

Christopher





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>