<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] A brave new world with the Siamese twins separated -- Verisign and NetSol;-)
- To: "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Registrars Constituency" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] A brave new world with the Siamese twins separated -- Verisign and NetSol;-)
- From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 11:32:04 +1000
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcOXBrKJ68uFVkltT6a8MsJIjsa2JwAbDyCQ
- Thread-topic: [registrars] A brave new world with the Siamese twins separated -- Verisign and NetSol;-)
Hello Bob,
> What makes me think that the registrY can
> register *anything*
> in it's own name? Doesn't it have to use an ICANN accredited
> registraR?
>
Appendix X of the registry agreement defines how a registry operator can
register a name in its own right.
Appendix X for .com states:
http://www.icann.org/tlds/agreements/verisign/registry-agmt-appx-16apr01
.htm
"Names Registered to Registry Operator
The domains to be registered by Registry Operator, other than on a
request submitted by a registrar pursuant to that registrar's
Registry-Registrar Agreement, are as follows:
None at this time."
Regards,
Bruce
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|