ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] A brave new world with the Siamese twins separated -- Verisign and NetSol;-)

  • To: "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Registrars Constituency" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [registrars] A brave new world with the Siamese twins separated -- Verisign and NetSol;-)
  • From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 11:32:04 +1000
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcOXBrKJ68uFVkltT6a8MsJIjsa2JwAbDyCQ
  • Thread-topic: [registrars] A brave new world with the Siamese twins separated -- Verisign and NetSol;-)

Hello Bob,

>  What makes me think that the registrY can 
> register *anything* 
> in it's own name?  Doesn't it have to use an ICANN accredited 
> registraR?
> 

Appendix X of the registry agreement defines how a registry operator can
register a name in its own right.

Appendix X for .com states:
http://www.icann.org/tlds/agreements/verisign/registry-agmt-appx-16apr01
.htm

"Names Registered to Registry Operator

The domains to be registered by Registry Operator, other than on a
request submitted by a registrar pursuant to that registrar's
Registry-Registrar Agreement, are as follows:

None at this time."


Regards,
Bruce



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>