ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] Third Draft Standard form of authorisation for use by losing registrars after a transfer is initiated

  • To: <tbarrett@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [registrars] Third Draft Standard form of authorisation for use by losing registrars after a transfer is initiated
  • From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 13:12:02 +1000
  • Cc: "Registrars Constituency" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcOOjIwlHQ4nQZDeSzCgBbI5y7MzygAT2AQw
  • Thread-topic: [registrars] Third Draft Standard form of authorisation for use by losing registrars after a transfer is initiated

Hello Tom,


> If I read this correctly, losing registrars can no longer NACK a
transfer if a
> registrant does not respond to an email confirmation.  Correct?  

> In other words, the transfer must be allowed by the losing registrar
even if 
> the registrant ignores the confirmation request from the losing
registrar.


Correct.  The gaining registrar however MUST receive confirmation from
the registrant prior to sending a transfer command to the registry.

A dispute resolution process has been established to deal with
situations where a losing registrars believes that a gaining registrar
has not obtained the appropriate authorisation.

Regards,
Bruce



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>