<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Third Draft Standard form of authorisation for use by losing registrars after a transfer is initiated
- To: <tbarrett@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] Third Draft Standard form of authorisation for use by losing registrars after a transfer is initiated
- From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 13:12:02 +1000
- Cc: "Registrars Constituency" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcOOjIwlHQ4nQZDeSzCgBbI5y7MzygAT2AQw
- Thread-topic: [registrars] Third Draft Standard form of authorisation for use by losing registrars after a transfer is initiated
Hello Tom,
> If I read this correctly, losing registrars can no longer NACK a
transfer if a
> registrant does not respond to an email confirmation. Correct?
> In other words, the transfer must be allowed by the losing registrar
even if
> the registrant ignores the confirmation request from the losing
registrar.
Correct. The gaining registrar however MUST receive confirmation from
the registrant prior to sending a transfer command to the registry.
A dispute resolution process has been established to deal with
situations where a losing registrars believes that a gaining registrar
has not obtained the appropriate authorisation.
Regards,
Bruce
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|