ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] Third Draft Standard form of authorisation for use by losing registrars after a transfer is initiated

  • To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Donny Simonton" <donny@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Rick Wesson" <wessorh@xxxxxx>, "Tina Dam" <dam@xxxxxxxxx>, <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Elana Broitman" <ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <grant.forsyth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <sricciardi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Karen Lentz" <lentz@xxxxxxxxx>, <halloran@xxxxxxxxx>, "Ellen Sondheim" <sondheim@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [registrars] Third Draft Standard form of authorisation for use by losing registrars after a transfer is initiated
  • From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 11:41:33 +1000
  • Cc: <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcOOa3TWn4tTAH5VTW+tdkSoodnaOwAY/XNA
  • Thread-topic: [registrars] Third Draft Standard form of authorisation for use by losing registrars after a transfer is initiated

Hello Chuck,

> 
> Did you mean "registrar" in this: "The notification in this 
> instance is from the registry."?
> 

I was talking in the context of a losing registrar receiving a
notification from the registry that a transfer RRP command has been
issued by a gaining registrar.

This is distinct from a gaining registrar receiving a request for
transfer from a registrant.

Regards,
Bruce





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>