<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Third Draft Standard form of authorisation for use by losing registrars after a transfer is initiated
- To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Donny Simonton" <donny@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Rick Wesson" <wessorh@xxxxxx>, "Tina Dam" <dam@xxxxxxxxx>, <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Elana Broitman" <ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <grant.forsyth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <sricciardi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Karen Lentz" <lentz@xxxxxxxxx>, <halloran@xxxxxxxxx>, "Ellen Sondheim" <sondheim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] Third Draft Standard form of authorisation for use by losing registrars after a transfer is initiated
- From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 11:41:33 +1000
- Cc: <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcOOa3TWn4tTAH5VTW+tdkSoodnaOwAY/XNA
- Thread-topic: [registrars] Third Draft Standard form of authorisation for use by losing registrars after a transfer is initiated
Hello Chuck,
>
> Did you mean "registrar" in this: "The notification in this
> instance is from the registry."?
>
I was talking in the context of a losing registrar receiving a
notification from the registry that a transfer RRP command has been
issued by a gaining registrar.
This is distinct from a gaining registrar receiving a request for
transfer from a registrant.
Regards,
Bruce
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|