<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Third Draft Standard form of authorisation for use by losing registrars after a transfer is initiated
- To: Registrars Constituency <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] Third Draft Standard form of authorisation for use by losing registrars after a transfer is initiated
- From: "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 09:53:18 -0700
- In-reply-to: <F17294CEA38B7248B6616B3CF1E1BD8D0254AF9F@cenmail01.netbene fit.co.uk>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<html>
<body>
At 03:13 PM 10/9/03 +0100, Gary Boyd wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite>But just so that I am clear. The
losing registrar email is only designed to<br>
be an alert to the <font color="#FF0000">registrant</font> (thereby
providing them with an opportunity to<br>
block the transfer) and therefore the registrant is not required to<br>
undertake any further action to complete the transfer process.
</blockquote><br>
Dear Gary: There is a related element. The Admin Contact may
request and authorize the transfer. Notification of the registrant
is a different matter. We have had cases where a hosting service,
which was also the Admin Contact, elected to order a transfer.
Subsequently, the registrant objected and demanded that the domain be
returned to PSI.<br><br>
I think there could be a few cases like that in many bulk transfers of
500 to 1,00 domains.<br><br>
Regards, BobC<br><br>
</body>
</html>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|