<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Third Draft Standard form of authorisation for use by losing registrars after a transfer is initiated
- To: Registrars Constituency <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] Third Draft Standard form of authorisation for use by losing registrars after a transfer is initiated
- From: "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 22:41:45 -0700
- In-reply-to: <000001c38e1a$78686fb0$6601a8c0@blackdell>
- References: <AFEF39657AEEC34193C494DBD71792220251210C@phoenix.mit>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
At 12:04 AM 10/9/03 -0400, tbarrett wrote:
Allowing resellers to send emails, either as the losing or gaining
registrar, causes confusion and opens the door to fraudulent transfers. I
know of no way of confirming the identity of a reseller.
Dear Tom: You are addressing the most important element of the transfer
problem.
Some registrars give their resellers a very long leash -- if any at all. I
frankly don't trust some of the reseller networks.
And how about the reseller's resellers networks; and the reseller's
resellers' resellers?
We're a long long way from the original Code of Conduct provisions:-( Few
of these registrants have any idea who is the real registrar. I think
ICANN should look at the problems created by these broken lines of
authority. Certainly I would like to put the resellers' RRA Agreements
through the scrutiny that *we* Accredited Registrars must contend with.
Regards, BobC
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I've sawed this board off three times, and it's *still* too short".
"Small choice between rotten apples." Dr. U.B. Bray
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|