RE: [registrars] Verisign change to operation of the .com DNS lookup service
- To: <wessorh@xxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] Verisign change to operation of the .com DNS lookup service
- From: "Elana Broitman" <ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 09:35:32 -0400
- Cc: "Jean-Michel Becar" <jmbecar@xxxxxx>, "Registrar Constituency" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcN9H8DwW8go3jP2TcOhck55p8MfZgAAMnKA
- Thread-topic: [registrars] Verisign change to operation of the .com DNS lookup service
please pass on to those as well. Thanks!
575 Eighth Avenue
New York, NY 10018
Phone (212) 798-9215
Fax (212) 629-9309
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 9:29 AM
To: Elana Broitman
Cc: Jean-Michel Becar; Registrar Constituency
Subject: RE: [registrars] Verisign change to operation of the .com DNS
I'll pass this on to the ASO, but they are the wrong folks to ask -- NANOG
or APRICOT would be more approprate forums.
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Elana Broitman wrote:
> That's an excellent suggestion. Rick, as CTO, should reach out to them, but if we don't hear from Rick prior to mid-day, could someone else who is technical volunteer.
> Elana Broitman
> 575 Eighth Avenue
> New York, NY 10018
> Phone (212) 798-9215
> Fax (212) 629-9309
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jean-Michel Becar [mailto:jmbecar@xxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 11:03 PM
> To: Registrar Constituency
> Subject: Re: [registrars] Verisign change to operation of the .com DNS
> lookup service
> Anyone talked to the ASO's folks?
> This new way of operating the .com .net zones will also have a big
> impact on the network operators and ISP as for example when you want to
> troubleshoot a network problem people will always get answer for any
> domain via a nslookup :-(
> Jean-Michel Becar
> Senior Architect
> Global Media Online INC.
> Tokyo - 150-8512
> Tel: +81 (0)3 5456 2687
> Robert F. Connelly wrote:
> > At 09:51 PM 9/16/03 -0400, Ross Wm. Rader wrote:
> >>> I think a little polishing would not hurt. Ross, is that okay or do
> >>> you want it presented as is?
> >> I'd prefer to move it forward as is. I'm a fan of the whereas etc.,
> >> but I'd rather move this forward *now* than wait another day for
> >> polishing...
> > Dear Ross: Done:-) Regards, BobC
> >> We could end up tying this up in "procedure" for longer than we
> >> actually have...let's just move forward as is...(and next time, I'll
> >> polish before I move ;)