<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Verisign change to operation of the .com DNS lookup service
- To: "'Elana Broitman'" <ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'Bruce Tonkin'" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] Verisign change to operation of the .com DNS lookup service
- From: "Donny Simonton" <donny@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 16:06:06 -0500
- Cc: <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <BCAAA5D64C837641A9EBB93E2A50894804F9BCBF@ex2k01.corp.register.com>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcN8O/Lf0wkCZKkxTLed/dlcSQfl8wAWIngAAABu9BA=
I fourth!
Donny
Intercosmos Media Group dba directNIC.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-
> registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Elana Broitman
> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 3:55 PM
> To: ross@xxxxxxxxxx; Bruce Tonkin
> Cc: registrars@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [registrars] Verisign change to operation of the .com DNS
> lookup service
>
> I note that Ross' motion received one "second." Our rules of procedure
> require 5 endorsements, so I will add myself to the endorsement list.
>
> If Ross can get 3 more, it can go forward for a vote. I also note,
> however, that the relevant date for getting our position heard is the GNSO
> Council's Sept. 25th telephone meeting. There seems to be a great deal of
> interest and concern among constituency members. Therefore, if there are
> no objections, I would recommend that we use boardrooms to vote on an
> expedited basis, so that a vote could be concluded by the 24th. Is there
> any objection?
>
> Regards,
>
> Elana Broitman
> Register.com
> 575 Eighth Avenue
> New York, NY 10018
> Phone (212) 798-9215
> Fax (212) 629-9309
> ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ross@xxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 6:12 AM
> To: Bruce Tonkin
> Cc: registrars@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [registrars] Verisign change to operation of the .com DNS
> lookup service
>
>
> On 9/16/2003 12:29 AM Bruce Tonkin noted that:
>
> > It would be useful to have a registrar constituency position on this
> > topic.
>
> Here's a motion for discussion
>
> "The Registrar Constituency strongly recommends that the GNSO Council
> advocate that ICANN explicitly require gTLD Registry Operators to return
> an NXDOMAIN response for DNS records that do not exist and that in all
> cases, wild-card entries in gTLD zones should be strictly forbidden."
> --
>
> There are any number of reasons why this is desirable, I don't think I
> need to rehash those.
>
> --
>
>
> -rwr
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|