RE: [registrars] Registrar Meeting - Closed Session

["Michael D. Palage" <michael@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Bob,

I am aware of this by-law provision. It was preceded by a similar by-law
provision from our last by-laws based upon the Melbourne meeting. I am not
stating that there was any violation of our by-laws. What I am requesting is
a copy of the minutes detailing why this extraordinary action was taken for
only the second time.

>From what I hear the meeting was productive. I listened in several times
during the course of the day via the telephone bridge. Kudos to the
executive committee for a successful meeting.

Thanks.

Mike

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Robert F. Connelly
> Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2003 3:06 AM
> To: Registrar Constituency
> Subject: Re: [registrars] Registrar Meeting - Closed Session
>
>
> At 09:03 PM 9/12/03 -0400, Michael D. Palage wrote:
> >It was not clear from your blog why the meeting was closed.
>
> Dear Michael:  Further to my prior posting, please note the following:
>
> Article 2.7 of our By-Laws:
>
> Observers - Registrar Constituency meetings and deliberations are open to
> Observers pursuant to section 2.6. The Executive Committee of the
> Registrar
> Constituency may, in its sole discretion, choose to suspend any
> observer's
> access to Registrar Constituency meetings and deliberations for portions
> of, or for the entire duration of meetings and deliberations, if the
> Executive Committee deems that having observers present is inappropriate,
> not feasible or contrary to the best interests of the Registrar
> Constituency. Any such actions will be noted in the minutes or official
> record of the meeting or deliberations.
>
> Cordially, BobC
>
>
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Never underestimate the power of inertia;-}
>
>