Re: [registrars] submission to House Committee - DRAFT

[Rick Wesson <wessorh@xxxxxx>]

Agreed.

Nothing should go to anyone, including congress, without discussion and a
formal vote, thats what the by-laws say.

We should take this as a lesson to have our ducks in a row BEFORE
congressional hearings.

-rick


On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Jim Archer wrote:

> Elana, if you are sending something on behalf of the RC, then I would think
> the RC would need to formally vote to do it.  The entire draft should be
> put to a formal vote, with time for the draft to be reviewed and debated by
> all members.
>
> Jim
>
>
>
>
> --On Friday, September 05, 2003 5:42 PM -0400 Elana Broitman
> <ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Dear Registrars - I have drafted a potential submission on behalf of the
> > Constituency to the US Congress Committee that held the hearing yesterday
> > on Whois accuracy. The goal of this letter is to illustrate for the
> > Committee the accuracy methods that we already implement and the costs of
> > doing so, so that they understand that what we do demonstrates our
> > compliance with the RAA.  Please indulge any spelling errors at this
> > point.  I will edit it further before sending the letter to Congress, but
> > wanted to get it out to you before the weekend.
> >
> > The hearing record will remain open only through Wednesday, so please
> > send me your edits by Close of Business Monday, Sept. 8th, so that I can
> > incorporate them into this draft.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Elana
> >
> >  <<Registrants' Whois Accuracy Congress letter.doc>>
>
>
>
>
>
> *************************
> James W. Archer
> CEO
> http://www.RegistrationTek.com
>