ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [registrars] submission to House Committee - DRAFT

  • To: Elana Broitman <ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, registrars@xxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [registrars] submission to House Committee - DRAFT
  • From: Jim Archer <jarcher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 18:30:44 -0400
  • In-reply-to: <BCAAA5D64C837641A9EBB93E2A50894804F9BAE0@ex2k01.corp.register.com>
  • References: <BCAAA5D64C837641A9EBB93E2A50894804F9BAE0@ex2k01.corp.register.c om>
  • Reply-to: Jim Archer <jarcher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Elana, if you are sending something on behalf of the RC, then I would think the RC would need to formally vote to do it. The entire draft should be put to a formal vote, with time for the draft to be reviewed and debated by all members.


--On Friday, September 05, 2003 5:42 PM -0400 Elana Broitman <ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Dear Registrars - I have drafted a potential submission on behalf of the
Constituency to the US Congress Committee that held the hearing yesterday
on Whois accuracy. The goal of this letter is to illustrate for the
Committee the accuracy methods that we already implement and the costs of
doing so, so that they understand that what we do demonstrates our
compliance with the RAA.  Please indulge any spelling errors at this
point.  I will edit it further before sending the letter to Congress, but
wanted to get it out to you before the weekend.

The hearing record will remain open only through Wednesday, so please
send me your edits by Close of Business Monday, Sept. 8th, so that I can
incorporate them into this draft.



 <<Registrants' Whois Accuracy Congress letter.doc>>

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>