<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] RE: Registrar Approval of Variable Accreditation Fee for 2003-2004
- To: Paul Stahura <stahura@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] RE: Registrar Approval of Variable Accreditation Fee for 2003-2004
- From: Rick Wesson <wessorh@xxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 16:55:12 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: "'Registrars List'" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <B911E41649D92844A1F86790EE98A0C60F89AC@mail.enom.com>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Paul Stahura wrote:
> Rick I see what you are saying but the problem is that the cost of
> implementation is great, and the cost of defeating it is very very
> small. Its not that it is possible to defeat it (which you and I
> agree that it is), its that it costs no money to defeat it. Its easy.
no, my point is all these systems are not designed to provide 100%
accuracy, so get over the 100% thing; its not how addressing of any type
works.
-rick
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|