[registrars] Review of registration data collected and displayed (WHOIS)
Hello All, Attached are 3 tables in Microsoft Word format. (1) A table of data elements typically collected at the time of registration from a registrant by a registrar. I have included a reference to a clause in the registrar accreditation agreement (RAA) http://www.icann.org/registrars/ra-agreement-17may01.htm where the element is compulsory. It is interesting to note that for the Registered Name Holder (Registrant) only their name and postal address is required - not email, fax, or phone. However for technical contact and admin contact the full contact details are required. (2) A table of data elements that are typically provided by a registrar or registry using the port-43 WHOIS protocol. Again I have included references to data elements that must be provided under the terms of the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA). Note that there are no performance requirements for registrars, other than that the information must be updated daily. It is possible for registrars to provide a service that is rate limited (e.g to one query per minute, hour, or day!). Some registry operators (e.g .biz) do commit in their contracts with ICANN to a performance level (in the case of .biz to respond to a WHOIS query within 1.5 seconds). (3) A table of data elements that are typically provided by a registrar or registry operator using a website. Note that there is no standardisation for the provision of a website service, but a registrar must provide BOTH a port-43 service AND a "interactice web page". Many registrars simply provide a web page interface to their port-43 service, but there is no requirement to do so. Note also as for (2) there is no performance requirement for a registrar. The port-43 service has very limited controls available to limit access to WHOIS data (other than various rate limitations possible based on source IP addresses). It may be appropriate to limit the information available on this service to basic network information - eg a domain name and its nameserver information. A web service in part (3) is amenable to more sophisticated approaches to limit data mining whilst still ensuring that the data elements can be read for legitimate purposes. A future CRISP protocol may eventually replace the requirement to use port-43 to provide access to data. Regards, Bruce Tonkin Attachment:
Data-elements.doc
|