<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Discussion stage for balloting procedures, in advance of voting on this issue.
- To: <Registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] Discussion stage for balloting procedures, in advance of voting on this issue.
- From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 10:12:55 +1000
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcNJYDinZEI6vvVjS/6G1lXCZjdzEQAO8i9g
- Thread-topic: [registrars] Discussion stage for balloting procedures, in advance of voting on this issue.
Hello All,
>
> 4. Continue to post individual voting results, during the
> entire voting
> period.
>
I support this last option because:
- it is easy to administer
- it is consistent with an open email discussion forum amongst
registrars, where the mailing list is publicly archived
- it is consistent with past practice of the registrars constituency
- it is consistent with the IETF - where views are expressed openly for
all to see and contribute
- the cost of making a change in terms of volunteer time or software
solutions outweighs any gains
- the present voting system is the most effective we have had to date
- I would rather we focus on some policy issues rather than fiddling
further with the voting process
Regards,
Bruce Tonkin
As a member of the registrars constituency
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|