ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [net-com] VeriSign and Neulevel

  • To: "'Philip Sheppard'" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>, "'Kurt Pritz'" <pritz@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [net-com] VeriSign and Neulevel
  • From: "Tina Dam" <dam@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 08:10:44 -0700
  • Cc: <net-com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <200406211015.i5LAFwQ9006202@turbo.aim.be>
  • Sender: owner-net-com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcRXcS2HwflLFz5nT3u6/UaZbtKEFQABr/CwADy7+xA=

The task you are requesting can certainly be made - however, I have not seen
your email in time for this to be ready for today's call, reason being that
I this week is in Denmark. I will be on the call in about an hour and we can
discuss further.

Best regards,

-----Original Message-----
From: Philip Sheppard [mailto:philip.sheppard@xxxxxx] 
Sent: Monday, June 21, 2004 3:17 AM
To: 'Tina Dam'; 'Kurt Pritz'
Cc: net-com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [net-com] VeriSign and Neulevel

It is regrettable that we receive lengthy comments from two potential
interested parties at the very end of the comment period. A little less
checking by the lawyers and more consideration for the process timelines
would have been helpful!

Could you do a comparison of the substantive changes proposed by Verisign
and Neulevel especially with respect to the absolute technical criteria?
They both propose lists and they might be essentially the same. A side by
side tabular comparison in a Word document would make evaluating these
possible additions much easier for the sub-committee on the June 22 call.
Look at the appendix of the Neulevel letter and the first part of the
Verisign letter.


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>