RE: [ispcp] Fw: Joint SO-AC-SG-C Submission on ICANN's Enhancing ICANN Accountabitliy Plan

["Tony Holmes" <tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Wolf-Ulrich ? thanks.

 

Olivier ? an excellent point to add.

 

Best

tony 

 

From: WUKnoben [mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: 27 September 2014 12:04
To: olivier.muron@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Tony Holmes; ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ispcp] Fw: Joint SO-AC-SG-C Submission on ICANN's Enhancing
ICANN Accountabitliy Plan

 

Thanks Olivier,

 

I?m just about finalizing the ISPCP statement and shall include your
suggested amendment.

I think then it?s ready to send out which I?ll do.

 

And there?s no objection for Tony to sign the joint statement.

Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich

 

From: olivier.muron@xxxxxxxxxx 

Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2014 12:43 PM

To: WUKnoben <mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>  

Cc: Tony Holmes <mailto:tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  ; ispcp@xxxxxxxxx 

Subject: Re: [ispcp] Fw: Joint SO-AC-SG-C Submission on ICANN's Enhancing
ICANN Accountabitliy Plan

 

Wolf, Tony,

 

Three points:

1) I agree we should support the joint statement,

2) I think we should also post our own, because it brings different
prospectives, on transparency, manageability and scope (legal status); my
understanding is that BC will also post one of its own,

3) I would suggest if it not too late to add to the first paragraph of our
statement the following sentence:

"We also suggest that participation in the Coordination Group from the
community be broadened to one representative per constituency, rather than
one per GNSO stakeholder group. The three constituencies of the CSG have
various perspectives and should each have a seat on the Coordination Group".


I understand that such a demand will be formulated by BC.





In the current context, it is very important to show unity, while having our
own voice heard...





Best regards,

Olivier




Le 25 sept. 2014 à 22:24, WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit
:

Olivier,

 

I understand the RySG document may be a starting point where some of the
essentials could be taken for the joint statement. RySG was asking all other
SGs to review this text and amend it as appropriate.

Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich

 

From: olivier.muron@xxxxxxxxxx 

Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 7:54 PM

To: Tony Holmes <mailto:tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  

Cc: WUKnoben <mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>  ; ispcp@xxxxxxxxx 

Subject: Re: [ispcp] Fw: Joint SO-AC-SG-C Submission on ICANN's Enhancing
ICANN Accountabitliy Plan

 

Tony,

I am in favour of joint statements whenever It is possible.

In the particular case, I know that time is short but I would like to read
the joint draft; at this point I read only the Ry text... nothing from BC! 

If we cannot agree on a joint statement, we should have one of our own. 

Regards,

Olivier


Le 25 sept. 2014 à 19:18, Tony Holmes <tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit
:

Colleagues

As time is very tight to respond I wanted to make it clear that unless
comments are received that are in opposition to signing on to a joint
statement, I will offer our support tomorrow.

Thanks

Tony

 

From: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of WUKnoben
Sent: 25 September 2014 11:15
To: ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ispcp] Fw: Joint SO-AC-SG-C Submission on ICANN's Enhancing ICANN
Accountabitliy Plan
Importance: High

 

Colleagues,

 

as the public comment period on ICANN?s Enhancing Accountability Plan is
coming to a close on 27 Sep our constituency has drafted a related comment,
see attached.

The initiative which lead ICANN to solicit public comment on the matter was
based on the joint letter to Fadi signed by all SO/AC/SG/constituency
leaders.

Consequently there is an effort to provide a joint SO/AC leaders statement,
too. I?m convinced that this would add considerable weight to our shared
concerns.

 

Please respond immediately whether in principle you are in support of this
approach or if there are basic objections.

Tony shall then advise the RySG who took a driver seat in this effort
whether we?ll join. 

The latest draft of the RySG comments on the Enhancing ICANN Accountability
process is also attached. 

Best regards

 

Wolf-Ulrich

____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________
 
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu
ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou
falsifie. Merci.
 
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and
delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________
 
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu
ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou
falsifie. Merci.
 
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and
delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.