ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ispcp]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [ispcp] WG: Updated WHOIS RT FInal Report Recommendations

  • To: <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>, <ispcp@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [ispcp] WG: Updated WHOIS RT FInal Report Recommendations
  • From: "tony holmes" <tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 18:42:53 -0000
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1351622574; bh=lI8qpNkqXgtmbNSeTeihMVT4LBMArizmvrN8JCV1LjM=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:Content-Language; b=ocV3CTXrCi2h8/q1fD4Zt6b42FxegdI+LpoyY9CnZrciZPIW94cqd/2hFUzXXQcjd/9UI8hDDd9VwONOFsUAIfjQT10mwGvEDWXqdY41/3/2I+81jb9mbOK4Vj43kSbKB/fnqqDH5F3O+V+6tZ2WH8duO13ymLHezolrE2hpt9k=
  • In-reply-to: <D9F923A733D99945931EF9A6D3436E57015BD3BFCB77@HE111646.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
  • List-id: ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <D9F923A733D99945931EF9A6D3436E57015BD3BFCB77@HE111646.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
  • Sender: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AQH7ts0weEOtQrainCcu2m7XHo/cD5d2Lthg
Wolf-Ulrich

Thanks - this fully reflects discussions within the ISPCP in Toronto.

Regards

Tony

 

From: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: 29 October 2012 04:12
To: ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ispcp] WG: Updated WHOIS RT FInal Report Recommendations

 

Sorry for being a bit late with this since Margie's deadline is today, Oct
29. 

 

I've already added ISPCP support for each of the recommendations themselves.
Please check and comment if any.

 

Best regards 
Wolf-Ulrich 

 


  _____  


Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im
Auftrag von Margie Milam
Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. Oktober 2012 22:05
An: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: [council] Updated WHOIS RT FInal Report Recommendations

Dear All,

 

As discussed last week,  I updated the draft WHOIS RT summary chart to
include the clarifications requested by the ISP Constituency, and to include
a column clarifying whether there was agreement with the substance of each
recommendation, based upon the comments submitted in the Public Comment
Forum (PCF) for the WHOIS Review Team Final Report.   

 

In reviewing the comments
<http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/report-comments-whois-rt-final-
report-11jul12-en.pdf>  filed in the PCF, I did not locate submissions from
each constituency/SG, making it difficult to complete the chart.   Notably
missing were comments from Registrars, NCSG, or the IPC on the Final Report
(although in some cases there were submissions on the draft report).   In
addition, from the comments actually submitted,  it was not clear whether
the commentators agreed/disagreed with the recommendation itself, since many
of the comments appeared to address aspects of the recommendations, as
opposed to evaluating the recommendation holistically.

 

As a result,  it is important that each constituency/stakeholder group
review the information contained in the attached chart, and indicate whether
they agree/disagree with each of the recommendations.      

 

Please provide this information by COB Monday, October 29, 2012, so that the
chart can be finalized in advance of the Board's consideration of the WHOIS
RT Final Report Recommendations.

 

All the best,

 

Margie

 

_______

 

Margie Milam

Senior Policy Counselor

ICANN

_______
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>