ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ispcp]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ispcp] WG: Updated WHOIS RT FInal Report Recommendations

  • To: <ispcp@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [ispcp] WG: Updated WHOIS RT FInal Report Recommendations
  • From: <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 05:11:57 +0100
  • Accept-language: de-DE
  • Acceptlanguage: de-DE
  • List-id: ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: Ac2xWForgXSP22jGTIeVGolF66+9vQEL8Pcg
  • Thread-topic: Updated WHOIS RT FInal Report Recommendations

Sorry for being a bit late with this since Margie's deadline is today, Oct 29.

I've already added ISPCP support for each of the recommendations themselves. Please check and comment if any.


Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich

________________________________
Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Margie Milam
Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. Oktober 2012 22:05
An: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: [council] Updated WHOIS RT FInal Report Recommendations

Dear All,

As discussed last week,  I updated the draft WHOIS RT summary chart to include the clarifications requested by the ISP Constituency, and to include a column clarifying whether there was agreement with the substance of each recommendation, based upon the comments submitted in the Public Comment Forum (PCF) for the WHOIS Review Team Final Report.

In reviewing the comments<http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/report-comments-whois-rt-final-report-11jul12-en.pdf> filed in the PCF, I did not locate submissions from each constituency/SG, making it difficult to complete the chart.   Notably missing were comments from Registrars, NCSG, or the IPC on the Final Report (although in some cases there were submissions on the draft report).   In addition, from the comments actually submitted,  it was not clear whether the commentators agreed/disagreed with the recommendation itself, since many of the comments appeared to address aspects of the recommendations, as opposed to evaluating the recommendation holistically.

As a result,  it is important that each constituency/stakeholder group review the information contained in the attached chart, and indicate whether they agree/disagree with each of the recommendations.

Please provide this information by COB Monday, October 29, 2012, so that the chart can be finalized in advance of the Board's consideration of the WHOIS RT Final Report Recommendations.

All the best,

Margie

_______

Margie Milam
Senior Policy Counselor
ICANN
_______


Attachment: WHOIS Review Team Final GC Recommendations - Toronto v5 - ISPCP.doc
Description: WHOIS Review Team Final GC Recommendations - Toronto v5 - ISPCP.doc



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>