ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ispcp]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

AW: [ispcp] WG: [council] Motion re. VI WG anD NEXT ISPCP Conf call

  • To: <tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <ispcp@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: AW: [ispcp] WG: [council] Motion re. VI WG anD NEXT ISPCP Conf call
  • From: <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:39:31 +0200
  • In-reply-to: <001801cb6070$c309e3c0$491dab40$@com>
  • List-id: ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <592F47825989E0468B5D719E571C6AEE028D8303@s4de8dsaanr.west.t-com.de> <001801cb6070$c309e3c0$491dab40$@com>
  • Sender: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: Actf/ylTpAteaizMQ0K0HUGFC5+RogAbqQRwAABPC8AACUAN4A==
  • Thread-topic: [ispcp] WG: [council] Motion re. VI WG anD NEXT ISPCP Conf call

I'd prefer Tuesday since the council will meet Thursday.

Wolf-Ulrich 


________________________________

	Von: Tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
	Gesendet: Donnerstag, 30. September 2010 09:26
	An: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich; ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
	Betreff: RE: [ispcp] WG: [council] Motion re. VI WG anD NEXT
ISPCP Conf call
	
	

	Wolf-Ulrich/All

	 

	I wasn't able to attend the last call as I was on vacation, but
I don't think another date was set.

	 

	Suggest we hold a call next week.

	 

	PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF YOU HAVE A PREFERENCE BETWEEN THE
FOLLOWING DATES.

	 

	-          Tuesday 5th October   14.00 - 15.00 UTC

	-          Thursday 7th October  13.00 - 14.00 UTC

	 

	Thanks

	 

	Tony

	 

	From: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx
	Sent: 30 September 2010 08:06
	To: ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
	Subject: [ispcp] WG: [council] Motion re. VI WG 

	 

	For discussion at our next call.

	 

	Do we have a date already?

	
	Wolf-Ulrich Knoben 

	 

	 

		 

		
________________________________


		Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Gomes, Chuck
		Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. September 2010 19:53
		An: Council GNSO
		Betreff: [council] Motion re. VI WG 

		<<Motion - VI Board Response 29 Sep 10.doc>> 

		In response to the Board retreat resolution regarding VI
and in order to meet the 8-day advance requirement for motions, I am
submitting this motion and would appreciate a second.  Please forward
this to your SGs and constituencies to determine support for the motion
on 7 October.

		I am not opposed to other ways of accomplishing this,
but thought that a motion is a clear way to kick it off.

		Chuck



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>