<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ispcp] ISPCP call
- To: "'Jaime Plug In'" <jaime@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>, <ispcp@xxxxxxxxx>, <Gisella.Gruber-White@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [ispcp] ISPCP call
- From: "Tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 22:46:24 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1271713586; bh=7GFI7Swfm93LT1/uSjM+NjQMzaF11jgXsMBgAo14gus=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:Content-Language; b=LM21/9nTCX955LwEskFEUvt4kd2tblDlof3ixM5j3mVowbPNqBFRjjGmzfBaAznCKpwI4kuYABAFN2qI2UFtAw1k56/VP02+njGIh+t3u9Q1XpALPncdJqpqvqbH5ylp+bUswWedLN9mUM5Glzjhb5fVN0uLlhqTxvCXqGQteJU=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:Content-Language; b=fUwUtvphgCvjTSnsMTklW09gVtCZGAu8QKNdwvqMPULapvJLTzkdvKPBl9OPHKiahlGgXmwzVS6j8hi9DWqbXYGlfSUMYJ/lSmgUW4QqRMX1jWrgyXr86opKCX0va3Tpypfj1rfohR+KCXywWSQojio8JJsvChVa98I4CmJNQes= ;
- In-reply-to: <00c101cae008$f14a50a0$d3def1e0$@plugin.com.br>
- List-id: ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <00e601cadf9b$8650af00$92f20d00$@com> <592F47825989E0468B5D719E571C6AEE0195B890@s4de8dsaanr.west.t-com.de> <018501cadfd1$16027860$42076920$@com> <00c101cae008$f14a50a0$d3def1e0$@plugin.com.br>
- Sender: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Acrfm4YBYgr1lVmIRL6RpyiDpxysxgANHouwAAAtW2AADfI5wAAAQEvw
Jaime
I cannot make that day but Wolf is also unable to make Thursday, the other
alternative seems to be Friday 23rd.
Views from others?
Tony
From: Jaime Plug In [mailto:jaime@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 19 April 2010 22:40
To: 'Tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx'; KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx; ispcp@xxxxxxxxx;
Gisella.Gruber-White@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RES: [ispcp] ISPCP call
On 22 April I cannot. May I suggest the 21st at 1700 UTC?
Jaime Wagner
<mailto:jaime@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> jaime@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cel (51) 8126-0916
Fax (51) 3123-1708
De: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Em nome
de Tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Enviada em: segunda-feira, 19 de abril de 2010 12:01
Para: KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx; ispcp@xxxxxxxxx; Gisella.Gruber-White@xxxxxxxxx
Assunto: RE: [ispcp] ISPCP call
Wolf-Ulrich
You are of course correct, even though it would be useful to turn the clock
back, alas we can't.
Sorry about the clash, but it was always going to prove difficult with such
a small window before the call.
Let me know if you have any strong feelings or input you'd like me to
present for you.
Regards
Tony
From: KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 19 April 2010 15:55
To: tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; ispcp@xxxxxxxxx;
Gisella.Gruber-White@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: AW: [ispcp] ISPCP call
I think you mean 22 April.
Unfortunately at the same time there shall be a PDP work team call.
Regards
Wolf-Ulrich
_____
Von: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im
Auftrag von Tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Gesendet: Montag, 19. April 2010 10:37
An: ispcp@xxxxxxxxx; Gisella Gruber-White
Betreff: [ispcp] ISPCP call
All
We need to hold an ad hoc conference call this week to discuss the
arrangements for the Brussels meeting, particularly the proposed change to
the breakfast meeting that some ISPCP members have expressed concerns over,
and also possible ISPCP involvement in the DNSSEC workshop in Brussels.
Apologies for the short notice.
Gisella - could you please arrange a conference call for a maximum of 45
minutes at 14.00 UTC on THURSDAY 15 April.
In view of the short notice, if you are unable to make the call, please
circulate any views to the list.
As we need to make a decision on the Brussels meeting quite quickly, I do
not feel we can delay this call pass Thursday.
Regards
Tony
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|