ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ispcp]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [ispcp] ISPCP call

  • To: <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>, <ispcp@xxxxxxxxx>, <Gisella.Gruber-White@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [ispcp] ISPCP call
  • From: "Tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 16:00:43 +0100
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1271689249; bh=lUnB33QQUiB5nC/eNz0A4CTzjEaJ1+rKlLmaVksUSyY=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:Content-Language; b=gEOQD9T038Hypp8irV8HfD7xdZ4UHnhF/rb0nzQVW/zX/J0dswV3LsLOSF9wEgB6oG7sULJ0TFqI946gT9FKCe6lngsAzawYGndDUGaMkdA2nu/4vNXI9yWYT37f6ywE30x3RIobNyqgcshfLQugK6LQvE9MBo+WO9Me7OaHkkI=
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:Content-Language; b=10kV4G3pIH8HJOo+pFaCpRAqwquHpbItbks0JkDpET50GIv2b1Ae9dwIZmKh5/IJA6gXhKjqthbs9JMQ2BLrhw45OloeIgtakw/zoFTKOO1yCFDGDLk5UhxrPKv5LqN1rS7kRv9qgWaxfR655iWcKObbN6cSGJl11GCdAKspDKU= ;
  • In-reply-to: <592F47825989E0468B5D719E571C6AEE0195B890@s4de8dsaanr.west.t-com.de>
  • List-id: ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <00e601cadf9b$8650af00$92f20d00$@com> <592F47825989E0468B5D719E571C6AEE0195B890@s4de8dsaanr.west.t-com.de>
  • Sender: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: Acrfm4YBYgr1lVmIRL6RpyiDpxysxgANHouwAAAtW2A=
Wolf-Ulrich

 

You are of course correct, even though it would be useful to turn the clock
back, alas we can't.

 

Sorry about the clash, but it was always going to prove difficult with such
a small window before the call.

 

Let me know if you have any strong feelings or input you'd like me to
present for you.

 

Regards

 

Tony

 

From: KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: 19 April 2010 15:55
To: tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; ispcp@xxxxxxxxx;
Gisella.Gruber-White@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: AW: [ispcp] ISPCP call

 

I think you mean 22 April.

Unfortunately at the same time there shall be a PDP work team call.

 

 

Regards 
Wolf-Ulrich 

 

 


  _____  


Von: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im
Auftrag von Tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Gesendet: Montag, 19. April 2010 10:37
An: ispcp@xxxxxxxxx; Gisella Gruber-White
Betreff: [ispcp] ISPCP call

All

 

We need to hold an ad hoc  conference call this week to discuss the
arrangements for the Brussels meeting, particularly the proposed change to
the breakfast meeting that some ISPCP members have expressed concerns over,
and also possible ISPCP involvement in the DNSSEC workshop in Brussels. 

 

Apologies for the short notice.

 

Gisella - could you please arrange a conference call for a maximum of 45
minutes at 14.00 UTC on THURSDAY 15 April.

 

In view of the short notice, if you are unable to make the call, please
circulate any views to the list. 

 

As we need to make a decision on the Brussels meeting quite quickly, I do
not feel we can delay this call pass Thursday.

 

Regards

 

Tony
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>