<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ispcp] NEW VERSION - ISPCP Draft Comments on US Government ICANN MoU Inquiry
- To: <mcfadden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <ispcp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [ispcp] NEW VERSION - ISPCP Draft Comments on US Government ICANN MoU Inquiry
- From: ANTÓNIO TAVARES <atavares@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:47:44 -0000
- In-reply-to: <44BB98F8.4080206@21st-century-texts.com>
- Organization: DIAL
- Reply-to: <atavares@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcaptmFo7wcNjgv3T5aIZ52nbH7S2AAAdV8w
Dear Mark
I like it very much now that details have been changed...
Regards
Antonio
-----Mensagem original-----
De: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Em nome
de Mark McFadden
Enviada: segunda-feira, 17 de Julho de 2006 14:05
Para: ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
Assunto: [ispcp] NEW VERSION - ISPCP Draft Comments on US Government ICANN
MoU Inquiry
All:
Here is version 1.3 of the ISPCP Response to the Department of
Commerce's Request for Comments on the ICANN MoU. Once again, I have
attached it in Microsoft Word and PDF formats.
Here are the substantial changes in the document:
- I have incorporated Greg's suggested text about formalizing the
administration of the root servers in section 2.5 (page 4);
- I have changed the words "tragic attempt" to misguided attempt" in the
discussion of weighted voting in section 2.4;
- I have tried to clarify the goal of improving existing relationships
with other related Internet organizations in some text in section 2.7;
- After Tony's comment, I have removed the text related to the NRO in
section 2.2 and 2.4;
I'd be very happy to have further comments from the Constituency for a
final draft. I'd like to send our comments to Commerce in the next 48
hours so please "Reply All" with comments as soon as you are able.
mark
Mark McFadden
Secretariat
ISPCP Constituency
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|