<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ispcp] Note to ISOC members on the NTIA request for comments on the MoU
- To: <mcfadden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <maggie.mansourkia@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [ispcp] Note to ISOC members on the NTIA request for comments on the MoU
- From: <tony.ar.holmes@xxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 20:50:45 +0100
- Cc: <greg_ruth@xxxxxxxxx>, <ispcp@xxxxxxxxx>, <owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Acaga043MI0ICWvuSfKPpJpg13HC/gAAJB9w
- Thread-topic: [ispcp] Note to ISOC members on the NTIA request for comments on the MoU
Greg/All
I also support the views expressed by Greg. The Internet now forms a
vital resource on which many of our economies are based, - time to do
things on a professional basis rather than rely on the 'old boy' way of
working before it all ends in tears.
Tony
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Mark McFadden
Sent: 05 July 2006 20:43
To: maggie.mansourkia@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Greg Ruth; ispcp@xxxxxxxxx; owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ispcp] Note to ISOC members on the NTIA request for
comments on the MoU
I'm drafting as we speak.
mark
maggie.mansourkia@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> No apologies necessary. I totally agree. Did we decide to file
> comments together on behalf of the ISPCP?
>
> Magnolia Mansourkia
> Chief Privacy Counsel
> Verizon Communications
> 703-351-3199 Voice
> 703-351-3653 Fax
> 202-744-3745 Mobile
>
>
> *Greg Ruth <greg_ruth@xxxxxxxxx>*
> Sent by: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> 07/05/2006 01:09 PM
>
>
> To
> mcfadden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
> cc
>
> Subject
> Re: [ispcp] Note to ISOC members on the NTIA request for
comments on
> the MoU
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> All,
> Does anyone else have a problem with the statement
>
> "...operational authority over the DNS root name server
> system through formal arrangements with the root name server operators
> is not desirable. We believe that the current distributed and
redundant
> way of operating the root name servers by a dozen independent
> organizations is highly successful."
>
> I think this Blanche DuBois strategy (depending on the kindness of
> strangers) is rather ingenuous (or, perhaps, disingenuous). It
> reflects the culture of the Internet about 20 years ago, when
> everything was done informally by "gentleman's agreement" (sorry
> Maggie). Things have changed. What's wrong with formal arrangements
> with the root name server operators?
>
> Greg
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|