No apologies necessary. I totally agree. Did we decide to file
comments together on behalf of the ISPCP?
Magnolia Mansourkia
Chief Privacy Counsel
Verizon Communications
703-351-3199 Voice
703-351-3653 Fax
202-744-3745 Mobile
*Greg Ruth <greg_ruth@xxxxxxxxx>*
Sent by: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
07/05/2006 01:09 PM
To
mcfadden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
cc
Subject
Re: [ispcp] Note to ISOC members on the NTIA request for comments on
the MoU
All,
Does anyone else have a problem with the statement
"...operational authority over the DNS root name server
system through formal arrangements with the root name server operators
is not desirable. We believe that the current distributed and redundant
way of operating the root name servers by a dozen independent
organizations is highly successful."
I think this Blanche DuBois strategy (depending on the kindness of
strangers) is rather ingenuous (or, perhaps, disingenuous). It
reflects the culture of the Internet about 20 years ago, when
everything was done informally by "gentleman's agreement" (sorry
Maggie). Things have changed. What's wrong with formal arrangements
with the root name server operators?
Greg
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com