ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Issues: ICANN fails, the senate commerce /False Representations

  • To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [ga] Issues: ICANN fails, the senate commerce /False Representations
  • From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 09:01:16 -0700 (PDT)
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=Ls7R8A/IxRuzVPW/jZ38OuLnTqMkQ2Ebm+SRcvLzAjSO+HE3TF5LtS/3f4RnvCfSncOVfKa4u/lc8X5wztpLOcG5oXqjYDTmu3ChA8cmunvDVOFS00S4wtK6GjJMr5NIouKIELPjdqPrTgEBINhqC6bxfzKx+bRWEwrC3F+PbYk=;
  • In-reply-to: <20070806140742.GA5890@malaria>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I think the dilatorious effect of false representations can be seen in this exchange.
  Perhaps we can see a perfect example that does not involve representations about oneself.
   
  Eric
   
  This deserves more investigation and debate

Kim Davies <kim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
  Hi,

Quoting Jeff Williams on Monday August 06, 2007:
| 
| For more relevant evidence as to ICANN's involvement and/or
| promotion of this failed idea, see:
| 
| http://www.cdt.org/headlines/654 most relevant

This has nothing to do with any ICANN involvement in kids.us. It reports
two separate items: one about the ICANN MOU, and one about kids.us
legislation. Neither are interrelated.

| http://www.fitug.de/icann-europe/0107/msg00020.html

This documents nothing to do with any ICANN involvement in kids.us.
It doesn't even discuss the subject.

| http://www.ntia.doc.gov/forums/kidsus/webcast.html

This documents nothing to do with any ICANN involvement in kids.us.
The word "ICANN" doesn't even appear once in the transcript.

| http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/ga/msg02040.html

Linking to yourself saying that kids.us is related to ICANN doesn't make
it true.

| http://www.icannwatch.org/articles/04/01/20/1714241.shtml

This documents nothing to do with any ICANN involvement in kids.us. In
fact, it says the exact opposite.

| Clearly ICANN's involvement in (kids.us) is well documented

Yes, from what you've shown it is clearly documented that ICANN isn't
involved in any way. As I said before, ICANN does not set each ccTLD's
policies, that is something for the countries to decide.

kim


       
---------------------------------
Yahoo! oneSearch: Finally,  mobile search that gives answers, not web links.
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>