<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] GA Rules - Defense
- To: GA <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [ga] GA Rules - Defense
- From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 12:47:26 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=aJLJKe1GTlrZqAb5CHD6La1/uPtL3UtxexUu2VsTyaT21lSEVeIL1TgG7vJUBVruE9g/4ncUVvJtUF8XwBW2K2hu2EKxNIkbolrQvl0vpA5wEGDNEwbv7CFDsfSsf4j0yZkaJoI3H/OtxuyjxpYW1sMjkz+apzQIatAhgJG5LZc=;
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Over the next few days I would like to take it upon ourselves to criticize and/or support the proposed list rules. I am not talking about verbiage here, I am talking about the concept and how and when or not to move forward.
We have also a few choices 1. Adoption by Chair. 2. Show of votes/hands for or against. 3. Polling place type votes. 4. A combination such as a show of hands in support of the chair adopting it.
Obviously the better grounded and open and transparent the better off we are.
As for my part, I shall defend the rules as drafted, and an adoption process that is as quick as possible.
Eric
as Chair
---------------------------------
Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story.
Play Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|