ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] primary objectives of the General Assembly mailing list

  • To: <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [ga] primary objectives of the General Assembly mailing list
  • From: "Prophet Partners Inc." <Domains@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 10:56:44 -0400
  • References: <200708011351.l71DpTvo003084@pechora1.lax.icann.org>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Debbie, Danny and Joop,

From time to time, some 3rd party views are brought forth on this mailing
list. Perhaps, substituting ICANN stakeholders for membership is better.

Sincerely,
Ted
Prophet Partners Inc.
http://www.ProphetPartners.com
http://www.Premium-Domain-Names.com


----- Original Message ----- From: "Debbie Garside" <debbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <terastra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "'Danny Younger'" <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>; <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 9:51 AM
Subject: RE: [ga] primary objectives of the General Assembly mailing list



Good.  I think we are in agreement.  I will formulate the text to cover
this, including: scope for ascertaining the views of the membership as a
whole - as opposed to just the rough consensus, voting procedures for
elections etc., as well as voting at any other time as determined by the
membership - at the request of at least 5 voting members.  Agreed?

I hope to have the next version available in the next 24 hours.

Best

Debbie

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Joop Teernstra
Sent: 26 July 2007 23:41
To: Danny Younger
Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ga] primary objectives of the General Assembly
mailing list

At 12:46 a.m. 27/07/2007, Danny Younger wrote:

>As such, I would change the wording to read "to ascertain
and transmit
>the views of the membership".

Agree.
I am far more comfortable with that.


>Please note that as some list participants are articulating the views >of special-interest communities (this is a cross-constituency >platform), the output of this body cannot necessarily be viewed as the >"views of the ordinary citizen".

Quite so.
I would prefer to use  voting rules mainly for things related
to the functioning of the list and elections of its officials.



-joop-




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>