<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] primary objectives of the General Assembly mailing list
- To: <terastra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Danny Younger'" <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>, <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [ga] primary objectives of the General Assembly mailing list
- From: "Debbie Garside" <debbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 14:51:09 +0100
- Cc: <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <5.0.2.1.2.20070727102952.04e4cb90@mail.terabytz.co.nz>
- Reply-to: debbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcfP2hJJpEqo6nXOSOGt9AylMamp+AEaByPw
Good. I think we are in agreement. I will formulate the text to cover
this, including: scope for ascertaining the views of the membership as a
whole - as opposed to just the rough consensus, voting procedures for
elections etc., as well as voting at any other time as determined by the
membership - at the request of at least 5 voting members. Agreed?
I hope to have the next version available in the next 24 hours.
Best
Debbie
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Joop Teernstra
> Sent: 26 July 2007 23:41
> To: Danny Younger
> Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ga] primary objectives of the General Assembly
> mailing list
>
> At 12:46 a.m. 27/07/2007, Danny Younger wrote:
>
> >As such, I would change the wording to read "to ascertain
> and transmit
> >the views of the membership".
>
> Agree.
> I am far more comfortable with that.
>
>
> >Please note that as some list participants are articulating
> the views
> >of special-interest communities (this is a cross-constituency
> >platform), the output of this body cannot necessarily be
> viewed as the
> >"views of the ordinary citizen".
>
> Quite so.
> I would prefer to use voting rules mainly for things related
> to the functioning of the list and elections of its officials.
>
>
>
> -joop-
>
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|