<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: Rules was [ga] FYI:Google's chief legal officer slapped with SEC fines
- To: <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Rules was [ga] FYI:Google's chief legal officer slapped with SEC fines
- From: "Debbie Garside" <debbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 12:38:05 +0100
- In-reply-to: <200707260652.l6Q6qbE5005610@smtp1.lax.icann.org>
- Reply-to: debbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcfPLCIKGpqjOm0SRGCA4jkJhNzyJwAI9HDgAApRFWA=
Roberto wrote:
> If this list goes back to
> reasonable business, the many subscribers who are even
> avoiding posting as of today might become active again. Worth a try?
Indeed. Something that a number of list members are trying to bring about
with the introduction of Rules.
Best
Debbie
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Roberto Gaetano
> Sent: 26 July 2007 07:53
> To: 'Joe Baptista'; 'Debbie Garside'
> Cc: 'Joshua Brady'; 'Jeff Williams'; 'Lauren Weinstein';
> 'vinton g. cerf'; 'SEC Enforcment'; 'General Assembly of the
> DNSO'; 'icann board address'; 'Paul Twomey'
> Subject: RE: [ga] FYI:Google's chief legal officer slapped
> with SEC fines
>
> I think that I have to partly agree with Joe, here.
> To somehow associate Vint with the actions that a current
> colleague of his did when he was working for a previous
> employer is not defamation. To my own metric, it is just plain silly.
> And it is true, all is fair on this list, that's why nobody
> is taking it seriously. Libel and slander, to be effective,
> need to come from a somewhat authoritative source, not from
> children playing in a sandbox. If this list goes back to
> reasonable business, the many subscribers who are even
> avoiding posting as of today might become active again. Worth a try?
> Best regards,
> Roberto
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Joe Baptista
> > Sent: 26 July 2007 03:49
> > To: Debbie Garside
> > Cc: 'Joshua Brady'; 'Jeff Williams'; 'Lauren Weinstein'; 'vinton g.
> > cerf'; 'SEC Enforcment'; 'General Assembly of the DNSO';
> 'icann board
> > address'; 'Paul Twomey'
> > Subject: Re: [ga] FYI:Google's chief legal officer slapped with SEC
> > fines
> >
> > Debbie Garside wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >Joe
> > >
> > >As you are the List Monitor, I, and the list, expect
> better from you.
> > >Nobody is fair game. This is the GA forum not a public
> > >hanging/slanging match. Please read the email from the Chair.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > But this is a public hanging/slanging list. Thats the way
> it's become
> > and has been for some time now. I look forward to the day we have
> > list rules in place, then it will become the productive
> place it was
> > ment to be and at one time was.
> > As it is today any thing is fair game. So as it stands
> Jeff has every
> > right to do as he pleases. If we want to change that - we need the
> > rules back in place. Rules at this stage are critical to moving
> > forward.
> >
> > regards
> > joe baptista
> >
> >
> > --
> > Joe Baptista www.publicroot.org
> > PublicRoot Consortium
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > The future of the Internet is Open, Transparent, Inclusive,
> > Representative & Accountable to the Internet community @large.
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > Office: +1 (202) 517-1593
> > Fax: +1 (509) 479-0084
> >
> >
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|