Re: [ga] FYI:Google's chief legal officer slapped with SEC fines

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Roberto and all,

  I did not imply anything, I ASK a simple question. And that's
all.  YOU are entirely far too defensive in your response which
in most legal parlance's I am aware of, only hightens and/or
encourages suspicion.  So I am glad the SEC is getting all this.

  Your innuendo by me anyway, is not missed.  I am also sure
the SEC shall not miss it either.  Not very clever Roberto...

  In any event, the SEC has a job and investigation to carry
out here.  As a stock holder, I intend to see that they do it
and will do everything I can to cooperate fully with them
in doing so.  Anyone whom else whom does not, is
obstructing justice.  Any list rule that would restrict same
in any manner, may also be obstructing justice, and Dr. Dierker
dam well knows it.  So justice must be served here.  Googles
users deserve it, the stockholders deserve it as well as have
bought and paid for it, any registrant deserves it, and as a tax
payer as well as a stockholder, I demand it.  I only hope Vint
will not be implicated, as logically dubious as that is likely to
be...

  So Roberto, if you find any of this to be silly, you have a
serious reality problem I believe...  And after the upcoming
national elections in my country, the whoppers Googles CEO
told in congressional testimony, once recognized and reviewed,
will not find that nonsense very silly at all...

Roberto Gaetano wrote:

> I think that I have to partly agree with Joe, here.
> To somehow associate Vint with the actions that a current colleague of his
> did when he was working for a previous employer is not defamation. To my own
> metric, it is just plain silly.
> And it is true, all is fair on this list, that's why nobody is taking it
> seriously. Libel and slander, to be effective, need to come from a somewhat
> authoritative source, not from children playing in a sandbox. If this list
> goes back to reasonable business, the many subscribers who are even avoiding
> posting as of today might become active again. Worth a try?
> Best regards,
> Roberto
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Joe Baptista
> > Sent: 26 July 2007 03:49
> > To: Debbie Garside
> > Cc: 'Joshua Brady'; 'Jeff Williams'; 'Lauren Weinstein';
> > 'vinton g. cerf'; 'SEC Enforcment'; 'General Assembly of the
> > DNSO'; 'icann board address'; 'Paul Twomey'
> > Subject: Re: [ga] FYI:Google's chief legal officer slapped
> > with SEC fines
> >
> > Debbie Garside wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >Joe
> > >
> > >As you are the List Monitor, I, and the list, expect better from you.
> > >Nobody is fair game.  This is the GA forum not a public
> > >hanging/slanging match.  Please read the email from the Chair.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > But this is a public hanging/slanging list.  Thats the way
> > it's become and has been for some time now.  I look forward
> > to the day we have list rules in place, then it will become
> > the productive place it was ment to be and at one time was.
> > As it is today any thing is fair game.  So as it stands Jeff
> > has every right to do as he pleases.  If we want to change
> > that - we need the rules back in place.  Rules at this stage
> > are critical to moving forward.
> >
> > regards
> > joe baptista
> >
> >
> > --
> > Joe Baptista                                www.publicroot.org
> > PublicRoot Consortium
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > The future of the Internet is Open, Transparent, Inclusive,
> > Representative & Accountable to the Internet community @large.
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >   Office: +1 (202) 517-1593
> >      Fax: +1 (509) 479-0084
> >
> >

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827