<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Draft GA List Rules
- To: GA <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] Draft GA List Rules
- From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 06:31:33 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=JdMCHfWS8llz19ZmXztdW+dwcqYJjEJldnluX978Y3KDq6E4TcGG0DKf53N8QaAvaa8tX7GW3DbyFx7/5b5xmD8YMvwym/sFk3ofUiVpGIftUL/pypHJAmOJm4lhvE6RZ/ro08UTHf5uMBsuxB0eZU8sAZKD5N+uWKHD6IAuxuU=;
- In-reply-to: <46947685.38598904@ix.netcom.com>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sorry. (note I am not saying that I am sorry for my actions simply for your problems.)
I intend to publish when done for ten repeated days to this list. I will also take the time to publish to each person on the last Narten's list. It will be a notice not the entire document.
Anyone willing to spend the volunteer time to republish the document in another format is welcome. I of course would help facilitate. In the same vein a volunteer is needed to add the rules with regard to election and governance of the chair. I am going to do it, but it seems a bit unseemly to have the chair draft chair rules.
If I can muster a reasonable response to vote on the rules then I shall dance the jig.
If I cannot muster a reasonable response I will (correctly) assume that the majority of the List believe this to be an administrative duty and act administratively accordingly.
People will have a choice to vote by commission or by omission.
Eric
Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dr. Dierker and all,
Well I have not been even able to read these draft new proposed
rules as they were not offered in a standard file format. .DOC is
not and never has been a standard file format. So how can I
even know if any amendments I might wish to offer? Additionally,
I believe the members of the GA need to have time to review, one
day is not enough, these draft new proposed rules. I believe they
after review, they should be voted on by the GA members as well.
Otherwise they are not legitimate.
Hugh Dierker wrote:
> I am not going to, not, move forward with this. I will submit this
> to the Council and the secretariat to update our rules. To be
> convinced I should act otherwise I will need to see specific
> amendments or a wholly new set.
>
> Eric
>
> Hugh Dierker wrote:
> Good Day,
>
> I could do this a lot of ways but decided on two methods. I was
> going to keep the identity of the person who worked so hard on this
> anonymous for a few days. This was to keep the debate centered on
> prinicples and not personality. But then I decided the Debbie Garside
> is tough enough to handle it and members will address the issue after
> giving some thanks. The second thing I did was to keep it rough and in
> the word format with corrections still marked, this will help assure
> that only those with real interest will work on it and that we act as
> though it is a work in progress not finished perfection.
> It should be noted that any glaring errors are probably mine as a
> result of tampering.
>
> It would be a fair assesment that we are getting somewhere as a
> body.
>
> I consider it appropriate to work on a second list probably not just
> what
> George wants, but sooner or later he will learn to play with others. I
> am working on getting us two seperate sublists.
>
> Avri Doria was thoughtful and caring enough to write us and asked
> simply that we address;
> "ask you all to start discussing issues related to the GSNO
> and ICANN policy." So I do believe we should all try and slant our
> debates in that way.
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
Abraham Lincoln
"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827
---------------------------------
Shape Yahoo! in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel today!
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|