<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] Proposal: New Cross-constituency mailing list
- To: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>, Debbie Garside <debbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, gkirikos@xxxxxxxxx, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: [ga] Proposal: New Cross-constituency mailing list
- From: jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 23:22:21 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
- Cc: kieren.mccarthy@xxxxxxxxx
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=ix.netcom.com; b=E01/Q8kv1FfgPERBlaEZOcG8LADz408p2fu3U/UJ+2xRyLW3nKpaOjcM8O/Ym4dh; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Cc:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:Content-Type:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
- Reply-to: jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<HEAD>
<STYLE>body{font-family: Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:9pt;background-color: #ffffff;color: black;}</STYLE>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3132" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=compText>
<STYLE>body{font-family: Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:9pt;background-color: #ffffff;color: black;}</STYLE>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3132" name=GENERATOR>
<P>Dr. Dierker and all,</P>
<P> </P>
<P> I am always interested in others points of view even if they do not agree</P>
<P>with mine or are stated in a manner which may be seemingly offensive</P>
<P>in some manner. Yet I am a bit dismayed by Georges recent remarks.</P>
<P>Maybe he is having a bad eMail day?! >:)<BR><BR><BR></P>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 0px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid">-----Original Message----- <BR>From: Hugh Dierker <HDIERKER2204@xxxxxxxxx><BR>Sent: Jul 7, 2007 6:11 PM <BR>To: Debbie Garside <DEBBIE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, gkirikos@xxxxxxxxx, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <BR>Cc: kieren.mccarthy@xxxxxxxxx <BR>Subject: RE: [ga] Proposal: New Cross-constituency mailing list <BR><BR>
<DIV>Oviously I welcome any input from George and usually gain by it.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I do not see this as an either/or. The chair already made the assumption said list would also be used for WGs and TFs on such matters as the RAA, list rules, elections and maybe some individual user stuff. In fact I like the notion that you would have to be serving in order to be on the list.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>But hey I live in laid back Southern California, and if it don't interfere with my surfin or skiing I seldom have an objection.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Eric<BR><BR><B><I>Debbie Garside <debbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx></I></B> wrote:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Hi George<BR><BR>Perhaps, rather than proposing a new (non-inclusive) list to combat the<BR>noise you could contribute to the efforts for the re-working of the GA<BR>Mailing List Rules that is currently taking place. I am sure your input<BR>would be welcomed by the Chair.<BR><BR>Best regards<BR><BR>Debbie<BR><BR></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE>
<P></P>Regards,<BR>Jeffrey A. Williams<BR>Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)<BR>"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -<BR> Abraham Lincoln<BR><BR>"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very<BR>often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt<BR><BR>"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability<BR>depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by<BR>P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."<BR>United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]<BR>===============================================================<BR>Updated 1/26/04<BR>CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of<BR>Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.<BR>ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<BR>Registered Email addr with the USPS Contact Number: 214-244-4827<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|