<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] Haiti, the Internet and ICANN
- To: <sotiris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [ga] Haiti, the Internet and ICANN
- From: "Roberto Gaetano" <roberto@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 09:11:27 +0200
- Cc: "'Debbie Garside'" <debbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <61397.216.154.18.52.1183473419.squirrel@mail.hermesnetwork.com>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Ace9gw4zitF+3tnhRQKf2NQz+ve18gAhA6rQ
Sotiris,
What exactly do you think has been done wrong in the redelegation of .IQ?
And what exact rule has been violated in that case?
I am not aware of any case in which IANA has *unilaterally* pulled the plug
from a ccTLD, the way you were suggesting doing for .HT, but if you think
the contrary, please provide a concrete case.
Cheers,
Roberto
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sotiris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:sotiris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 03 July 2007 16:37
> To: Roberto Gaetano
> Cc: sotiris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 'Debbie Garside'; ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ga] Haiti, the Internet and ICANN
>
>
> >
> > I personally share the same feelings (and I am sure that
> Debbie also
> > does) against child slavery, but would argue that it is *not*
> > something involving ICANN policy.
> > ICANN is providing a public service in delegating ccTLDs,
> and cannot
> > get into personal evaluation of the internal politics of the
> > countries. I think that Debbie is right in arguing that if ICANN
> > starts to to this, it could be the beginning of a slippery slope.
>
> Roberto, ICANN has already done it... they did it to Iraq's
> .IQ ccTLD. So, the slope already exists.
>
> Sotiris
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|