RE: [ga] Haiti the Internet and ICANN

["Vint Cerf" <vint@xxxxxxxxxx>]

.IE is for Ireland, not .EI 


Vinton G Cerf
Chief Internet Evangelist
Google
Regus Suite 384
13800 Coppermine Road
Herndon, VA 20171
 
+1 703 234-1823
+1 703-234-5822 (f)
 
vint@xxxxxxxxxx
www.google.com
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Debbie Garside [mailto:debbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 10:43 AM
To: jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; 'Hugh Dierker'
Cc: 'ga'; 'icann board address'; 'icann staff'; 'vinton g. cerf'
Subject: RE: [ga] Haiti the Internet and ICANN

Hi Jeff

I should just make one or two corrections for you that I missed in my last
email:

.IR is the Country Code for Iran

.EI is the Country Code for Ireland (EIRE)

Ireland has never formed part of any other country.

Northern Ireland forms part of the UK and last I heard they had devolved to
an Assembly.  Technically, as they are geographically removed from the UK
mainland and now (since May 2007) have a devolved administration they MAY be
eligible for a Country Code.  However, given the history of the NI Assembly,
it is, perhaps, a little too soon to be counting our chickens! In any case,
personally FWIW, I don't like the thought of NI getting a Country Code.  I
would like to see them under .EI  

Best regards

Debbie

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jeff Williams
> Sent: 04 July 2007 05:05
> To: Hugh Dierker
> Cc: ga; icann board address; icann staff; vinton g. cerf
> Subject: Re: [ga] Haiti the Internet and ICANN
> 
> Dr. Dierker and all,
> 
>  Well let se now, the Vatican has it's own ccTLD or some call it an 
> sTLD = Special TLD, yet no other religious deity has one.  Isn't that 
> a bit odd?  Also Scotland applied for a ccTLD and was denied, remember 
> those debates?  However Ireland has it's own ccTLD, doesn't that 
> dichotomy strike you as rather odd as well?  And .Iq has been assigned 
> to Iraq yet has no functioning NIC or NOC, even odder still?
> And now we have the dubiously illustrious Haiti getting it's own ccTLD 
> granted by the omnipotent ICANN Bod.
> 
>   I am very sure the Scots are not very pleased and may now start to 
> wonder if the Vatican is not happy with how they practice Catholicism 
> or that ICANN has all along viewed them as blasphemers in comparison 
> to the peoples of Haiti.  Now I am a Jew, and even in the new 
> testament we are gods chosen people, yet ICANN has not yet seem fit to 
> bestow upon us our own ccTLD or sTLD.  Why is that I wonder, is it 
> because we have offended our Catholic brothers in some very egregious 
> way, or are we not deserving of such a bestowance by the omnipotent 
> ICANN?
> Are we worse than the world recognized criminal state of Haiti?  Is it 
> because we are allied in the state of Israel in a struggle against 
> those whom would seek to destroy us and the state of Israel?  If it is 
> any of these reasons why than we ask for the aid of the holy se for 
> his assistance in recognizing us to the omnipotent Bod of ICANN to 
> grant us our deliverance and allow us our own ccTLD or sTLD.
> 
>   So now Dr. Dierker, are you and Debbie beginning to get the drift 
> here, or need I go further?  Is this not an illustration of why ICANN 
> Directors desperately need to be directly elected by any and all 
> interested stakeholders, users and/or registrants?  I mean really now, 
> Scotland isn't deserving of a ccTLD and Haiti is?  England is 
> deserving of 2 ccTLD's, .GB and .UK and Ireland with .IR and yet 
> again, Scotland is not?  Come on now folks, wake up and smell the 
> coffee or tea if you prefer, and recognize ICANN sense it's inception 
> practices Selective Censorship in one of it most ugly forms.  Any form 
> of imposed Censorship is wrong.  I reject such behavior or concept, I 
> hope all of you will also.
> 
> Hugh Dierker wrote:
> 
> >    I have seen too many instances where it was the massive
> influx and
> > outflux of information that actually changed a rather dire
> situation.
> > Information Technology should target areas of destitution and civil 
> > wrong (don't ask; Soviet Union, South Africa, Vietnam and Womens 
> > rights throughout the Middle East) Also I do not believe it is the 
> > call of non-transparent and non-representative
> organizations to decide
> > when and where we engage in embargos of information - next
> they would
> > embargo all red states/or would that be blue? Education(IT), 
> > medicines, food and water should not be part of a bargaining chip.
> >
> >   But it is fun to sit around and decide who should and
> should not get
> > the internet. I would knock out all politicians and parties but not 
> > individuals and then of course all religions, except mine.
> >
> >   Eric
> >
> >
> 
> Regards,
> 
> --
> Jeffrey A. Williams
> Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders
> strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
>    Abraham Lincoln
> 
> "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is 
> very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
> 
> "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; 
> liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
> P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
> United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] 
> ===============================================================
> Updated 1/26/04
> CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. 
> div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
> ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail 
> jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx  Registered Email addr with the USPS Contact 
> Number: 214-244-4827
> 
>