RE: [ga] RE: issues that are long closed?

[Joop Teernstra <terastra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 07:53 p.m. 3/07/2007, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
> Joop,
>
> I think that we are talking past eachother on two different wavelengths:
> what I mean is that the issue of individual registrants representation in
> the GNSO is still on the table (and sorry for pointing out that we are far
> from having consensus on it, but this just a reality check), while the
> global election by individual members is currently not.

Hi Roberto,

I think the two-wavelenghts spring from  you wanting to address both Danny 
and me in one message. We are eh,.. individuals.

I want to plead for a constituency for individual registrants. That has to 
be the starting point.

You have seen my comment on Milton's NCUC draft.

As for a  well reasoned and motivated paper: how about the Carl Bildt's 
/Esther Dyson's ALSC report?
http://atlargestudy.org/final_report.shtml

After all, ICANN  paid good money for that.

Isn't the time ripe to dust it off? The arguments remain the same. Only the 
shape and form can be further argued.


-joop-