<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] Increased foreign attendance
- To: Roberto Gaetano <roberto@xxxxxxxxx>, sotiris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "'Debbie Garside'" <debbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [ga] Increased foreign attendance
- From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 11:24:43 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=lwfMZoP0b8zy94W7fIGTJ+NonBxyBYcq7isXa05peB0ixIgcOLIzC/Tb7wM3lBTV9bOhYQopovu80zz5coxxNCqKS2fCRX6PSPkg6fPzh272Ae7PhAaggX3VKex1xe67Gd7A8Xh0c98gGgVJICMeHszx3fSgDDeHatrsozZ1Nyc=;
- In-reply-to: <200706291400.l5TE0bP4020788@smtp01.icann.org>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Roberto,
I follow most of your logic but this phrase seems a little wrong;
Roberto Gaetano <roberto@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<SNIP>
IMHO, the registries, registrars, domainers, etc. do not participate in this
process as businesses, but for the function that they play in the DNS. And
in fact registries, for instance, can be businesses but also non profits. As
well as domainers can be individuals, do not need to be business
organizations, even if they draw a profit from their activities.
Cheers,
Roberto
Are suggesting that Registries do not represent registries?
Eric
---------------------------------
Need Mail bonding?
Go to the Yahoo! Mail Q&A for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|