<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] ICANN Employment Policies and Related Materials
- To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [ga] ICANN Employment Policies and Related Materials
- From: veni markovski <veni@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 21:54:51 -0400
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:x-mailer:date:to:from:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:sender:message-id; b=H8YQJPOKBAEF6soHWwdBfyM7WGqv8bBO9s4yD915qbc9zidG0B1m3AmlzX/4BE9lz1cWrgU0Kj+PF4D/sWY/t6Y1MMM9vlORM4NfmCaMllNKdt8y4oIfTffW1f6Q8zAifb+tSUYmZdviDFFfANKzc5E6/z3DQA3HNByNXWFB0U0=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:x-mailer:date:to:from:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:sender:message-id; b=JgqDHnPldZvJIBPlAmPpb7WLytr8NJb6EVx5RCzuppJyAxUH13GKJVsJYz8X83J3zS3KFJjJEOwze6JcBf0IuKGH3qfDNnMj16h0x0cOGhqLxs+Dhqz5/IVa4RSrBhEKeU/TTy+88MRA/1Im03DKEU0ujD60xP/i6YrIZHIWtak=
- In-reply-to: <46842E48.6020703@cavebear.com>
- References: <11163.67595.qm@web52202.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <46842E48.6020703@cavebear.com>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi, Karl!
At 14:55 6/28/2007 -0700, Karl Auerbach wrote:
(ICANN has several very good employees, and care should be taken to
make it clear that questions about employee policies are not
questions about the quality of individual employees.)
I have to disagree with you on using the word "several", which in my
understanding, and according to uncle Webster is "an indefinite
number more than 2 or 3 but not many". ICANN currently has many good
employees, and to eliminate even one of them would require some
grounds, based on grades by his/her managers, senior management, COO,
CEO. I would go to the extent to say that all ICANN employees are
good, and if you claim differently, you should have some grounds for
that, not just subjective expression of opinion.
Best,
Veni
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|