<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] independent review and information disclosure policies posted
I should add that the status of the Ombudsman is similar to that of
independent review: the Bylaws specifically require the Ombudsman to be
appointed by the Board, but there has never been a publicly-disclosed
Board resolution to appoint an Ombudsman. ICANN simply issued a press
release that an Ombudsman had been appointed. By whom or how was not
specified. The announced term of the initial "appointment" has expired,
and there has been no publicly-disclosed Board decision to renew or extend
it:
http://forum.icann.org/lists/transparency-2007/msg00003.html
So there is neither a properly-appointed Ombudsman nor a properly
designated IRP or independent review procedures.
And the Reconsideration Committee has acted in ways forbidden by the
Bylaws:
http://hasbrouck.org/blog/archives/001196.html
*None* of the so-called accountability mechanisms in th Bylaws have
actually been propoerly implemented.
For more detail, see:
http://hasbrouck.org/icann
----------------
Edward Hasbrouck
<edward@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<http://hasbrouck.org>
+1-415-824-0214
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|