Re: [ga] Public Comments Sought on GNSO Improvements

[jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Joop and all,

  Here I must agree with Joop.  Repeated discussions
on this area or issue is overly redundant. We have been
over and over this ground too many times to yet again
go over the same arguments, statements, logic, ect., ect., 
ect., ad nausium. 

-----Original Message-----
>From: Joop Teernstra <terastra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Jun 23, 2007 5:17 PM
>To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Cc: "Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M." <roddixon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: [ga] Public Comments Sought on GNSO Improvements
>
>At 06:33 a.m. 24/06/2007, Hugh Dierker wrote:
>>I have given this proposition reasonable time. I have noticed many posting 
>>since this mailing.
>>I have specifically noted 0 posts in opposition.
>>
>>There has been some discussion regarding making the constituency 
>>exclusively an IDNO versus an all inclusive Individual Users constituency.
>>
>>Let us have some pointed discussion on the benefits and drawbacks of 
>>having either.
>>
>
><Deep sigh>. As if this has not been debated 100 times before.
>
>How can you ask for representation of general users if there is not even a 
>place in the GNSO for *specific* stakeholders?
>
>General Users need representation in future Internet Governance Bodies, no 
>doubt, but Domain Registrants need representation in this DNS governance 
>here and now.
>
>I don't care how you call the constituency, Individual Registrants, DN 
>holders, or whatever, but the criterion here should be having a *specific* 
>stake in the outcome of GNSO policy recommendations. (such as there are)
>
>
>
>-joop-
>
Regards,
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very
often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability
depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of
Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Registered Email addr with the USPS Contact Number: 214-244-4827