ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Public Comments Sought on GNSO Improvements


At 06:33 a.m. 24/06/2007, Hugh Dierker wrote:
I have given this proposition reasonable time. I have noticed many posting since this mailing.
I have specifically noted 0 posts in opposition.


There has been some discussion regarding making the constituency exclusively an IDNO versus an all inclusive Individual Users constituency.

Let us have some pointed discussion on the benefits and drawbacks of having either.


<Deep sigh>. As if this has not been debated 100 times before.

How can you ask for representation of general users if there is not even a place in the GNSO for *specific* stakeholders?

General Users need representation in future Internet Governance Bodies, no doubt, but Domain Registrants need representation in this DNS governance here and now.

I don't care how you call the constituency, Individual Registrants, DN holders, or whatever, but the criterion here should be having a *specific* stake in the outcome of GNSO policy recommendations. (such as there are)



-joop-




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>