ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [ga] Call for Statements of Interest -- NA RALO Seats on ALAC

  • To: Roberto Gaetano <roberto@xxxxxxxxx>, "'Danny Younger'" <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>, "'veni markovski'" <veni@xxxxxxxx>, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: RE: [ga] Call for Statements of Interest -- NA RALO Seats on ALAC
  • From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 11:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=CqcwasY5gVovMPAh/v1NcmOA6vK5QSX7q0Q2y4Cpmg4wpXFobBk4OboDHeI26KKLhXyZBhifji6jy6/mf4HVP8ni5Q6aaTVllVxk91BhAc2Z+1lO/4RPig661DaXr/2BFvhZu8+PqbrWVFoCAh98wdemE8CPIE/cTg/8VGSRF6M=;
  • In-reply-to: <200706222225.l5MMPRGP008023@smtp01.icann.org>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Roberto,
   
  I see you get the point. It is for the General public to give notice of elections. Kind of like gossip. I think you would want to rethink this position. How hard is it to send out notices to ICANN and ICANN related sites?  We can ask Glen how difficult that part of her job is.
   
  Eric

Roberto Gaetano <roberto@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
  Danny,
Since the seat is for representing NA RALO, I find it perfectly acceptable
to post it in the relevant mailing list, i.e. the NA RALO.
Obviously, participants to the NA RALO mailing list, like you, can post it
to other list as they see fit.
Cheers,
Roberto


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Danny Younger
> Sent: 22 June 2007 16:37
> To: veni markovski; ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ga] Call for Statements of Interest -- NA RALO 
> Seats on ALAC
> 
> Veni,
> 
> You understand that no outreach was done whatsoever? 
> Just a Call posted to a single small list? And you find this 
> acceptable? Shame on you.
> 
> 
> --- veni markovski wrote:
> 
> > Danny,
> > you understand that sometimes the quality is not in the quantity, 
> > right?
> > As for that - I believe we have had a discussion about the 
> > participation in the At Large process. People can choose to 
> be part of 
> > this solution, or part of the problem, or part of the landscape.
> > And, as Wendy pointed out, there is no problem for the 
> organizations 
> > (e.g. ISOC-New York) to be more active at the At Large.
> > So, you could contribute, or continue to try to mock and ruin other 
> > people's efforts.
> > 
> > veni
> > 
> > At 09:51 6/22/2007 -0700, Danny Younger wrote:
> > >Spotted only on the North American discuss list -- really great 
> > >outreach if all you want is a tiny
> > club.
> > >Probably deserves a complaint to the Ombudsman's office...
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> ______________________
> Looking for a deal? Find great prices on flights and hotels 
> with Yahoo! FareChase.
> http://farechase.yahoo.com/



 
---------------------------------
Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate
in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A.
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>